Gå til innhold
  • Bli medlem

Jan Roger Hansvoll

IPMS Medlem
 Vis profil  Se deres aktivitet

  • Innlegg

    1 019

  • Ble med

  • Besøkte siden sist

 Innholdstype 

Innlegg skrevet av Jan Roger Hansvoll

    Det norske luftforsvar anno 2020

    i Luftforsvaret

    Skrevet

    Sakset ut noe av svarene som ble gitt på nettmøte igår, plukket ut det som var mest norsk relatert.

     

    The F-35 is subjected to the most stringent and extremely demanding testing, modeling, and simulation criteria, that include operations in the most severe environmental conditions imaginable. Remember, the US has a major interest in Arctic operations since we, too, are an Arctic nation, and two of our most important fighter bases are in Alaska! Yep, Norway will get the same fighter as the US will obtain, except that Norway has asked for a drag-chute (similar to the F-16). That's the only difference (please see my earlier responses on this issue).

     

    Q: NSM

     

    Will Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II still be capitable to carry two NSM(Naval Strike Missile) airborne and fire these with the same accurecy as an sea-to-sea or earth-to-sea missile platform?

    And will F-35 be adapted to norwegian air condition?

    Will JSF have any problems to mach the russian SU-27 and MiG-27?

    Weapon system, speed, feets etc.?

     

    Good questions. First, the JSF program partnership has been asked to consider Norway's Joint Strike Missile (an air-launched variant of Norway's Naval Strike Missile that is currently being developed at Kongsberg) for the F-35. Initial studies have examined cockpit integration and weapons bay fitting of the JSM. These studies are positive, and the JSF partners will determine future requirements for the missile.

    Yes, the F-35 for Norway meets Norwegian requirements. One unique addition for Norwegian F-35s is a drag-chute for stopping on icy runways, such as Norwegian F-16s have today.

    No problem for the F-35 to defeat the SU-27 and Mig-29. In fact, advanced modeling and simulation indicate the F-35 is clearly superior to much more capable aircraft than either of these two.

     

    At present, much of what we know regarding F-35 air-to-air capabilities are (as you have suggested) based on modelling and simulation. In that arena the F-35 meets or exceeds expectations and decisively dominants any threat. Regarding a hypothetical 1v1 scenario with a SU-30/35, I honestly don't believe that's relevant any more. 5th generation capabilities have revolutionized air combat and those sorts of scenarios are becoming less likely. When was the last real turning combat dogfight? Why not shoot just shoot him high-aspect with Helmet Mounted Cueing and high off-boresight missiles? I think the days of saddling up for guns at 1500 feet are closing. As far as the lessons we've learned from F-22 and applied to the F-35, remember that the Lightning has the advantage of an additional 15 years or so of technology development, and while it was not designed with the Raptor's thrust-vectoring and super-cruise requirements, there are mnay systems already on the F-35 that will be retrofit to the F-22.

     

    Q: Evolution

     

    Wouldnt one say that as everything evolves, planes would too, and needs.

     

    And in that case would you say that the F-35A Jetfighter is going in the right direction as a 5th generation weapons platfrom?

     

    The F-35 is truly built for the future, and the concept embraces the fact that the aircraft will have to be constantly modified and upgraded to operate in any future potential environment. These updates will occur in "spirals" or "block" upgrades. In fact, when Norway begins receiving F-35s in 2016, the aircraft will already be in Block 4 production, with a planned Block 5 on the horizon. Of course, all earlier blocks will receive the updates and advanced capabilities of each succeeding block.

     

    JR :)

     

    Flere svar her: http://www.dagbladet.no/nyheter/2008/12/01/556318.html

     

     

    Tamiya klarlakk - Halvblank?

    i Klarlakk, mattlakk osv.

    Skrevet

    Sitter nå for tiden med et par modeller jeg gjerne skulle lagt ett lag lakk på, slik at ikke malingen forsvinner så lett ved berøring.

     

    Jeg tolker dette til at du har lakkert med akrylmaling, og da bør du være forsiktig med TS-lakken som kan være "hissig". Det er en sjanse for at malingen din vil koke, så prøv på noe annet først, det gjelder forøvrig på alle "eksprimenter".  :pinch:

     

    Spraybokser er ikke det helt idelle, men bilbygger'ne kan dette så helt gærli kan det ikke være.  ;D Problemet er kontroll over mengde maling/lakk som kommer ut av tuten.

     

    JR

    JR's fargerike F-16A

    i F-16 [Avsluttet]

    Skrevet

    Forlenges ??

     

    Det skal vel ende opp i en spiss foran ved luftinntaket og tilsvarende bak ved motoren.

     

    Nils

     

    Riktig det, men min er en smule kortere. den skal gå nesten ut til blåselampa. Det ser også ut som den har en kromning og ikke så spiss som jeg har gjort det.  :)

     

    JR

    JR's fargerike F-16A

    i F-16 [Avsluttet]

    Skrevet

    Da er renseprosessen igang.  :pinch: En stor fordel jeg har er at det hvite er så "tykt" at jeg kan gå ganske hardt tilverks.  :)

     

    Så har jeg fått instruksjons scannen fra Jens og så at det blåfeltet under skal gå lengre bakover og være mere avrundet. AAARRGGH.

    Vidre ser det ut til at bukfinnene ser ut til å være hvite på innsiden uten at dette er henvist med tekst i tegningen. Ikke lett dette. 

     

    Det tar noe lenger tid enn planlagt men jeg kommer vel i mål.  :'(

     

    JR  :)

×
×
  • Opprett ny...

Viktig informasjon

Ved å besøke og/eller registrerer deg på vårt forum aksepterer du våre vilkår og personvernregler. Bruksvilkår.

  I accept